January 20, 2012 | By admin In
Technology,
aha!,
anatomy,
do push the pink button,
doing it wrong,
hmm,
hold on let me try again,
i knew it,
iffy,
magic buttons,
medical,
relationships,
science,
sex,
sexy time,
we may never know,
womens |
Comments(0)

The female g-spot: much like a fountain of youth or an all-you-can-eat buffet where the other patrons aren’t so fat that you’re too disgusted to eat, men have spent centuries trying to find one. And now penis doctor urologist Amichai Kilchevsky adds his two cents to the growing amount of skepticism about a mythical come-button. Based on a review of 96 published studies, an Israeli and American research team came to one conclusion. “Without a doubt, a discreet anatomic entity called the G-spot does not exist,” said Dr. Amichai Kilchevsky, a urology resident at Yale-New Haven Hospital in Connecticut, and lead author of the review, published Jan. 12 in the Journal of Sexual Medicine. Kilchevsky conceded the work is not “1,000 percent conclusive,” allowing that other scientists could one day find something his team missed. But they would need new technology to do it, he said. AHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA!! Sorry Amichai, but anybody calling themselves a doctor who uses phrases like “1,000 percent conclusive” can’t be trusted. Sucks too because I was really hoping there wasn’t a g-spot. Oh well, looks like it’s back to studying the vagina map my friend drew for me in middle school! Now if my calculations are correct, then this X should mark the spot. “Your maps upside down.” So…. “So that would be her b-hole.” B -hole, G -spot — I think I’m getting warmer! G-Spot Does Not Exist, ‘Without A Doubt,’ Say Researchers [huffingtonpost] Thanks to PYY, who doesn’t care if there’s a g-spot or not just so long as she can… you know — O_O
More here:
"Experts": ‘Without A Doubt’ There Is No G-Spot
Filed under: Technology, aha!, anatomy, do push the pink button, doing it wrong, hmm, hold on let me try again, i knew it, iffy, magic buttons, medical, relationships, science, sex, sexy time, we may never know, womens
August 19, 2011 | By admin In
Design,
Technology,
bzzzzzzzzzzz,
for the ladies,
ladies?,
not bad,
real product,
sure why not,
usb,
vibrating,
womens |
Comments(0)

Note to self: no more borrowing flash drives. Designer Ti Chang (of Knife Coathook fame) just sent me her latest coming-to-market concept: the Duet, a USB flash drive vibrator . Well she didn’t actually SEND me one, just the info. Otherwise I’d have a USB vibrator in my butt right now. Made of body-safe silicone and metal, the Duet is designed for the female body. With dual motors, it can deliver powerful and precise vibration exactly where you want it. The tip, inside edges, and outside edges provide slightly different intensities so that you can customize your pleasure! The Duet contains 4 vibration modes and 5 power levels so that you can customize the experience with the perfect intensity. When we say that this toy is completely waterproof, we mean it. Not only is it fully submersible in a bathtub, the Duet is waterproof to more than 3 meters. The finger-drive will come in three models — no storage, 8GB and 16GB. There’s a Kickstarter-esque page to fund the project, which surpassed its $15,000 goal in two days. But you can still donate $75 (retail $139) to receive one when they’re made. Me? I make my own vibrators. *taping wind-up car to greased Sharpie* Funding Page (where you can order one) Thanks Ti, and keep those great designs coming . *retires*
Visit link:
The Sexist USB Drive (Is Actually A Vibrator)
Filed under: Design, Technology, bzzzzzzzzzzz, for the ladies, ladies?, not bad, real product, sure why not, usb, vibrating, womens
May 19, 2011 | By admin In
Technology,
ipad,
is that...a fur bikini?,
magazine,
nekkid,
playboy,
reading is fundamental,
sessy time!,
subscription,
womens,
yow yow |
Comments(0)

Where was I in ‘72? Not even born yet, let alone staring at a bunch of jungle bush! Playboy has just announced the roll-out (like Transformers! NOT like fruit snacks — those roll up . Plus some gush!) of iPlayboy, a subscription service optimized for iPad viewing that grants a user access to every issue of Playboy ever published in its 57-year history (over 130,000 pages!). I imagine it was designed for those of you who keep an iPad on the back of your toilet. A subscription will set you back $8/month $60/year or $100/two years and is the perfect gift for your iPad owning father. However it is NOT the perfect gift for your iPad owning niece (sorry Kaitlyn — that was my bad). Official Site
View original post here:
Reading Is Fundamental: iPads, Now With More Playboy (Read: Every Issue EVAR)
Filed under: Technology, ipad, is that...a fur bikini?, magazine, nekkid, playboy, reading is fundamental, sessy time!, subscription, womens, yow yow
March 4, 2011 | By admin In
Technology,
cards,
cosplay,
crafty,
dress,
gotta catch 'em all!,
homemade,
nice sword,
playing dress up,
pokemon,
sure why not,
womens |
Comments(0)

Note: Full-res version HERE in case you ubernerds want to complain about the value of the cards she cut up instead of just yelling ‘I’D DO HER!’ in the comments and calling it a day like a normal pervert. This is a chick wearing a dress (and armor!) made entirely out of Pokemon cards (no word if she’s wearing a Pokebra or not). That’s pretty much all I’ve got. I think she’s supposed to be a gladiator or something. I dunno, if it were her vs. two lions I’d put all my money on the lions. Literally — like stacking things on cats! You think I’m afraid of lions? I’m not afraid of lions. Lions are afraid of me . “Yeah, but only because you told them you’re the one that killed Simba’s dad.” WTF BRO — givin’ away my trade-secrets?! Not coo. Chomiji’s Flickr via Girl dressed up in armor made of Pokmon Cards [albotas]
Read more from the original source:
Gotta Catch ‘Em All (Hopefully On Your Bedroom Floor!): A Pokemon-Card Dress
Filed under: Technology, cards, cosplay, crafty, dress, gotta catch 'em all!, homemade, nice sword, playing dress up, pokemon, sure why not, womens
February 21, 2011 | By admin In
Technology,
biological warfare,
biology,
blood,
hold me,
holy cramps,
holy crapples,
holy smokes,
i'm scared,
i've seen it all now,
underwear,
womens,
wtf am i looking at?,
yikes!,
zomg,
zomgoggles |
Comments(0)

Period Panties are $12 colored skivvies for ladies to wear while they’re on their monthly emotion-fest so they don’t ruin a pair of frilly lace ones. Or something. Honestly, I don’t know anything about women and only learned last week vaginas aren’t oriented sideways like I always imagined. So yeah, I’m probably the wrong person to ask for stuff like this. For directions, sure, but I am going to send you into the worst part of town I can think of. Which, fun fact: is my neighborhood. Then I’ll follow you on my bike and beat you up and steal your hubcaps. I’MMA SELL ‘EM FOR CRACK! Hit the jump for the two other designs and a link to the product site.
Here is the original post:
You Don’t Even Want To Know: Period Panties
Filed under: Technology, biological warfare, biology, blood, hold me, holy cramps, holy crapples, holy smokes, i'm scared, i've seen it all now, underwear, womens, wtf am i looking at?, yikes!, zomg, zomgoggles
February 15, 2011 | By admin In
Technology,
coreography,
dance-fighting,
fight,
fighting games,
fighting in the street,
finish him!,
good job,
good looking,
hi-ya,
kick his ass c. bass!,
kicks,
ladies?,
martial arts,
punching you in the face,
street-fighter,
video,
womens |
Comments(0)

Remember the Street Fighter IV ultra combos video from a couple weeks ago? Pretty awesome, right? Yeah, TOO BAD IT WAS A TOTAL SAUSAGE LUNCHEON. So to make up for all the man-meat, the creators decided to shoot another video featuring ladies bringing the pain to a bunch of goofuses. How these dudes even got in the Street Fighting league is beyond me, but I suspect it has something to do with having a rich uncle alumni. Which, fun fact, is the only way half our youth is going to get into college after filling out their entrance essays in text-talk. Just watch, in twenty years there won’t even be any new scientists. Strippers and cheap laborers, yes. “I’m cool with that.” Oh I know you are, buddy. “In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.” HA! You do realize you just admitted you’re still a one-off, right? Hit the jump for the femme fatales in action.
Follow this link:
Street Fighter Ultra Combos: Now With Ladies
Filed under: Technology, coreography, dance-fighting, fight, fighting games, fighting in the street, finish him!, good job, good looking, hi-ya, kick his ass c. bass!, kicks, ladies?, martial arts, punching you in the face, street-fighter, video, womens
February 7, 2011 | By admin In
Technology,
babies,
clever,
force,
iffy,
inventions,
patent,
physics,
questionable,
science,
smart,
sure why not,
womens,
wtf did i just watch? |
Comments(0)

This is a patent from 1963 for a device that’s supposed to make birthing easier by practically shooting babies out of vaginas with the helpful hand of centrifugal force . Basically a woman is strapped into this thing, it starts spinning like mad, and she projectile vomits for a while until PRESTO! a baby comes flying out like a circus clown out of a cannon. Thankfully, the newborn is caught by a special baby-catching net (DO NOT FORGET TO ATTACH THE NET!) between the woman’s legs and the apparatus immediately shuts down. Wow, and to think 50-years later this isn’t the standard practice. WHY YOU LADIES GOTTA HATE ON SCIENCE?! Apparatus For Facilitating The Birth Of A Child By Centrifugal Force [googlepatents] Thanks to Dot.AY, who heard water-births are where it’s at. EVIAN BABIES FTW!
View post:
Giving Birth As Terrifying Carnival Ride: 1963 ‘Apparatus For Facilitating The Birth Of A Child By Centrifugal Force’ Patent
Filed under: Technology, babies, clever, force, iffy, inventions, patent, physics, questionable, science, smart, sure why not, womens, wtf did i just watch?
January 6, 2011 | By admin In
Technology,
characters,
female,
flowchart,
ladies womens,
ladies?,
learning by looking,
reading,
sex,
sex appeal,
typecasting,
womens,
words |
Comments(0)
Give a hoot, don’t pollute go blind, click HERE to see the entire giant-ass chart. There’s nothing more beautiful than a strong, female character. Unfortunately, in this misogynistic world in which we live there aren’t neaaaaarly enough. Now I know what you ladies are thinking, and no, Bella the vampire-babymaker doesn’t count. She’s actually the worst female character ever invented excluding all my ex-girlfriends. Who, for the record, could suck the life-blood out of a mortal man twice as fast. Mr. Nice Guy over here! Anyway, this is the flowchart of female character design. Some more info: This flowchart focuses on the one- and two-dimensional female characters we see over and over again in modern fiction. The graphic does not include every type of female character that has ever existed, but I did my best to focus on the most important tropes. Some of the listed tropes might be considered crazy-sexist, and others represent more positive stereotypes. The tropes are subjective, and they exist on a continuum of sexism. Consider Family Guy’s Lois Griffin (who falls under the category of “Perfect Wife”). Lois isn’t a particularly complex female character, and the idea of a fun-loving sexpot wife who stands by her man no matter what he does is kinda-sorta sexist, in that this character is a fantasy fetish figure tailor-made for adolescent male audiences. But as far as sitcom housewives go, I’d much prefer to watch a Lois-type character than a classic sitcom shrew like Debra from Everybody Loves Raymond . At least Lois represents a more positive (and sex-positive) stereotype. If you’re a writer and you find that one of your characters fits one of the categories on this chart, there’s no need to panic (or start yelling at me)! Two-dimensional characters are the backbone of fiction, especially fantasy fiction and most comedies. However, if you find that all or most of your main male protagonists are well-developed and all or most of your female characters are not, you should probably start worrying a little. (Chris Nolan.) When you get to the “love interests” section of this chart, be aware that it refers primarily to heterosexual relationships. It’s not that I’m trying to be heteronormative; it’s that, hey, we’re talking about modern pop culture here. How often do you see homosexual rom/coms or long-term lesbian relationships on TV or in the movies? (Porn doesn’t count.) The exception, of course, is The Wire , but then Kima and her girlfriend were obviously well-developed strong female characters who wouldn’t be found in this flowchart in the first place. Obviously , this chart in no way applies that there aren’t male stereotypes out there in the pop culture ether. There are. Obviously . But it seems like Hollywood has a significantly harder time writing non-stereotypical female characters than male ones, so I made this chart to help out. Wow lady, way to NOT lose my interest, amirite?! Just sayin’, did anybody else read all that? Because I actually did. And not just to prove that I can read long things like a grownup, but that’s probably the most words I’ve ever read that weren’t printed on the back of a cereal box. I like the ones that are just mazes! The Female Character Flowchart [overthinkingit] Thanks to Laura, who IS a strong female character. Oh yeah? *flexing abs — okay, mushing rolls together* PUNCH ME AS HARD AS YOU CAN!
Continue reading here:
Go Womens!: The Female Character Flowchart
Filed under: Technology, characters, female, flowchart, ladies womens, ladies?, learning by looking, reading, sex, sex appeal, typecasting, womens, words
December 17, 2010 | By admin In
Technology,
batgirl,
bling,
catwoman,
characters,
cz,
dc comics,
finger candy,
for the ladies,
gotham city,
i love shiny things,
jewelry,
ladies?,
neck candy,
shiny,
supergirl,
sure why not,
womens,
wonder woman,
wrist candy |
Comments(0)
This is a gallery of a bunch of bling created by jeweler nOir for DC Comics . That’s the Gotham City ring there, but there’s a ton of other stuff after the jump. They’ve got all sorts of rings , bracelets and necklaces and prices range from ~$50 to several hundred depending on the piece. No, I’m not getting paid to post this. Most of it blows. See? Just kidding, it’s actually alright, particularly the Catwoman and Wonder Woman stuff. The Supergirl stuff sucks though but I’m pretty sure Shaq just bought it all anyways so no biggie. Hit the jump for 16 more pieces from the collections in this order: Batgirl, Catwoman, Supergirl and Wonder Woman. Oh, plus a bonus t-rex ring they make that it’s not too late to buy me for Christmas.
Continue reading here:
A Gallery For The Ladies: DC Comics Jewelry
Filed under: Technology, batgirl, bling, catwoman, characters, cz, dc comics, finger candy, for the ladies, gotham city, i love shiny things, jewelry, ladies?, neck candy, shiny, supergirl, sure why not, womens, wonder woman, wrist candy
October 8, 2010 | By admin In
Technology,
beautiful,
chemistry,
hot,
laboratory,
ladies?,
love potion number 9,
music video,
no no no,
parody,
questionable,
sure why not,
valiant effort,
womens |
Comments(0)
This is parody song and music video for Flight of the Conchord’s ‘Most Beautiful Girl in the Room’. Except it’s called ‘Most Beautiful Girl in the Lab’. It does not do the original justice . Like, at all. It’s real bad, folks. Just kidding, I’ve spent the last ten minutes memorizing the lyrics . LYING GW IS LYING AGAIN! Filmed by PhD students in UCSF’s Tetrad Graduate Program for an annual departmental retreat. Listen, I know lab situations are usually pretty slim pickins in the beautiful womens department, but you know what? That’s okay . Just sayin’, I used to work in a lab curing cancer with magic potions lasers and I was the most beautiful girl in the lab. *struttin’ that ass* Every scientist on the lab wanted to experiment! Hit the jump for the video.
Here is the original post:
‘Most Beautiful Girl In The Lab’ Music Video
Filed under: Technology, beautiful, chemistry, hot, laboratory, ladies?, love potion number 9, music video, no no no, parody, questionable, sure why not, valiant effort, womens
Next Page »