
Apple’s refusal to discuss how and why it approves applications for the iPhone works with us geeks, because there’s no stake beyond our own curiosity and the business interests of developers. But in refusing to discuss how and why it approved Baby Shaker , it’s come up against an organization that just isn’t going to take that sort of nonsense. From Information Week: Apple’s refusal to disclose how the application found its way onto the App Store was one of several complaints the Sarah Jane Brain Foundation had with the company’s apology, which the group called “stale.” “Who is this apology directed to?” said Patrick Donohue, founder of the foundation. “It’s directed at the media to kill the story. This is the most cynical apology I have ever seen.” Donohue founded the SJBF after his three year-old daughter was shaken by a nurse as an infant and left brain-damaged: one can well imagine that Apple’s isn’t the first apology he’s ever heard. SJBF insists that Apple offer an accounting of the circumstances that led to it approving the $1 program, in which the user shakes a crying baby until it is dead. Apple has denied approval to racy novels, TV show South Park and many other candidate applications on grounds of potential offensiveness. Apple Apology For Baby Shaker Criticized [InformationWeek]
View post:
"The most cynical apology I have ever seen"